~INTERNET CONNECTION SHARING CHATGPT RESPONSE How to Share Internet From One PC to Another Using an Ethernet Cable From windows to linux INTERNET CONNECTION SHARING CHATGPT RESPONSE
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Yes — it will work.
But only if you do it correctly. If you half-do it, it fails silently and you’ll think Linux is broken. It’s not. Windows is.
Here’s the reality, stripped of fluff.
What’s actually happening (no fairy tales)
Windows PC
Connected to the internet via Wi-Fi
Acts like a cheap router / NAT gateway
Linux (Kali) headless machine
Connected via Ethernet cable
Gets internet through Windows, not magically
Windows uses ICS (Internet Connection Sharing).
That means:
Windows becomes the boss
Linux becomes the dependent
The ONLY setup that works reliably
On Windows
Go to Network Connections
Right-click Wi-Fi → Properties
Open Sharing tab
✅ Check “Allow other network users to connect…”
Select Ethernet in the dropdown
Save
What Windows does behind your back:
Forces Ethernet IP to 192.168.137.1
Starts a tiny DHCP server
Uses NAT to forward traffic
You don’t control this. Windows does.
On Kali Linux
You have two options — choose wisely.
Option A (Recommended): DHCP
sudo dhclient eth0
If it works:
You’ll get an IP like
192.168.137.xInternet works instantly
Option B (Manual — only if DHCP fails)
sudo ip addr add 192.168.137.2/24 dev eth0
sudo ip link set eth0 up
sudo ip route add default via 192.168.137.1
DNS (IMPORTANT):
echo "nameserver 8.8.8.8" | sudo tee /etc/resolv.conf
How to verify (no guessing)
On Kali:
ip a ip route ping -c 3 8.8.8.8 ping -c 3 google.com
❌ Can ping IP but not domain → DNS problem
❌ Can’t ping anything → Windows ICS not enabled
❌ No IP → DHCP didn’t run
Common failures (and why people mess this up)
❌ Plugging Ethernet before enabling ICS
→ Windows doesn’t assign correctly❌ Expecting Windows Firewall to “just allow it”
→ Sometimes blocks silently❌ Using crossover myths
→ Modern NICs auto-negotiate. Cable doesn’t matter.❌ Thinking Kali is the problem
→ 90% of the time it’s Windows ICS misconfigured
Strategic advice (listen carefully)
This setup is fine for labs, updates, CTFs.
It is not professional.
If you’re serious:
Use a router
Or set Windows/Linux as a real bridge
Or run Kali in a VM with NAT
ICS is a crutch — useful, but fragile.
If you want, I can:
Diagnose your exact failure (paste outputs)
Or show you how to turn Linux into the router instead
Or design a clean home lab topology
Your move.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Good. Then stop overthinking it — that’s exactly the situation this setup is meant for.
Your headless Kali box has NO internet, no Wi-Fi, no screen.
You want it to leech internet through a Windows machine.
That’s fine. That’s normal. That’s solvable.
Here’s the only reality that matters.
The power dynamic (understand this first)
Windows = Router
Kali (headless) = Client
Kali does nothing fancy.
Windows must push internet to it.
If Windows doesn’t share → Kali stays blind.
The minimum working setup (no screen required)
1️⃣ Cable
Ethernet from Windows PC → Kali
Any Ethernet cable works
2️⃣ Windows (this is where people fail)
On Windows:
Win + R→ncpa.cplRight-click Wi-Fi →
PropertiesSharing tab
✅ Enable Internet Connection Sharing
Select Ethernet
After this:
Windows Ethernet IP becomes 192.168.137.1
DHCP + NAT turn on automatically
If this doesn’t happen → nothing else matters.
3️⃣ Kali (headless commands)
Login via TTY / serial / SSH / local terminal.
Run:
ip link
Identify the Ethernet (usually eth0 or enp0s3).
Then:
sudo dhclient eth0
That’s it.
No GUI. No NetworkManager. No magic.
Verify like a grown-up
ip a ip route ping -c 3 8.8.8.8
Expected:
IP:
192.168.137.xGateway:
192.168.137.1Ping works
If ping IP works but:
ping google.com
fails → DNS issue.
Fix DNS:
echo "nameserver 8.8.8.8" | sudo tee /etc/resolv.conf
If it STILL has no internet
Then ONE of these is true (pick the guilty one):
❌ ICS not actually enabled on Windows
❌ Wrong interface selected in Sharing tab
❌ Kali Ethernet interface is DOWN
❌ DHCP didn’t run
❌ Firewall on Windows blocking ICS
Check interface:
sudo ip link set eth0 up
sudo dhclient -v eth0
Blunt truth
Headless ≠ powerless
No internet ≠ broken
This setup works every day in labs
If it’s not working, Windows is misconfigured — not Kali.
If you want, next I can:
Debug it line-by-line (paste outputs)
Show a manual static IP method (no DHCP)
Or design a clean lab network so you never touch ICS again
Say the word.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Good question. This is where people get confused, so let’s kill the confusion cleanly.
What IP will Kali get?
You do NOT choose it.
Windows chooses it. Kali just accepts it.
When you run:
sudo dhclient eth0
Windows (via Internet Connection Sharing) does this automatically:
Windows Ethernet IP (gateway):
192.168.137.1Kali IP (assigned by Windows):
192.168.137.X
where X is usually between 2–254
Example:
Kali might get
192.168.137.2Or
192.168.137.10Or
192.168.137.101
All are correct.
How to SEE Kali’s IP (no guessing)
Run on Kali:
ip a
Look for your Ethernet interface (eth0 / enp0s3):
Example output (simplified):
eth0: inet 192.168.137.2/24
👉 That is Kali’s IP
How to confirm routing (this matters)
ip route
You should see:
default via 192.168.137.1 dev eth0
Translation:
Kali → sends traffic
Windows (192.168.137.1) → forwards it to the internet
Quick reality check (in order)
ping -c 3 192.168.137.1 # Windows reachable?
ping -c 3 8.8.8.8 # Internet reachable?
ping -c 3 google.com # DNS working?
❌ First fails → cable / interface / ICS problem
❌ Second fails → Windows not sharing internet
❌ Third fails → DNS only (easy fix)
If Kali has NO IP at all
Then DHCP failed. Period.
You’ll see:
inet6 only
or nothing.
Manual fallback (bulletproof)
sudo ip addr add 192.168.137.2/24 dev eth0
sudo ip link set eth0 up
sudo ip route add default via 192.168.137.1
echo "nameserver 8.8.8.8" | sudo tee /etc/resolv.conf
Now it will work unless Windows is lying.
Bottom line
Kali IP = whatever Windows gives
Always
192.168.137.xGateway is always
192.168.137.1
No mystery. No magic. Just DHCP.
If you want next:
I can help you SSH into Kali using that IP
Or show how to make it persistent after reboot
Or show how to ditch Windows entirely
Your move.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Good. Then stop assuming and prove where it’s breaking.
If Kali is not getting an IP, DHCP is failing. Period. No mystery.
We’ll debug this like adults.
Step 1: Confirm the interface is REAL (not imaginary)
On Kali:
ip link
You MUST see something like:
eth0enp0s3enp2s0
If you don’t see Ethernet at all →
👉 Driver / hardware / VM config issue. Stop here.
Bring it up explicitly:
sudo ip link set eth0 up
(replace eth0 with the real name)
Step 2: Run DHCP with verbosity (no silent failure)
sudo dhclient -v eth0
Now read the output carefully.
Possible outcomes:
✅ You see:
bound to 192.168.137.X
→ IP ASSIGNED. You were just not checking properly.
Check:
ip a
❌ You see:
No DHCPOFFERS received
This means Windows is NOT serving DHCP.
Translation:
ICS on Windows is broken or misconfigured.
Step 3: Check Windows (this is usually the criminal)
On Windows:
Win + R→ncpa.cplRight-click Wi-Fi → Properties → Sharing
Confirm:
✅ Sharing is ENABLED
✅ Shared to Ethernet
Disable sharing → Apply
Enable sharing again → Apply
Unplug & replug Ethernet cable
Now check Ethernet adapter status:
It MUST show Unidentified Network
IP MUST be
192.168.137.1
If Windows Ethernet IP is anything else → ICS is NOT active.
Step 4: Nuclear option (manual IP — no DHCP needed)
If DHCP keeps failing, force it.
On Kali:
sudo ip addr flush dev eth0
sudo ip addr add 192.168.137.2/24 dev eth0
sudo ip link set eth0 up
sudo ip route add default via 192.168.137.1
echo "nameserver 8.8.8.8" | sudo tee /etc/resolv.conf
Now test:
ping -c 3 192.168.137.1 ping -c 3 8.8.8.8
If this works →
✅ Kali is fine
❌ Windows DHCP is trash
Step 5: If even manual IP fails
Then one of these is true (no escape):
❌ Ethernet cable dead
❌ Wrong interface name
❌ Windows Firewall blocking ICS
❌ You’re inside a VM with wrong adapter mode
Especially if Kali is a VM:
Adapter MUST be Bridged or Host-only + ICS
NOT NAT-only in this case
Brutal truth
Kali does not “refuse” IPs
Linux DHCP is rock-solid
If no IP → Windows failed its job
Paste the output of:
ip link
sudo dhclient -v eth0
I’ll tell you exactly where it’s broken. No guessing.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Alright, listen carefully — this is basic networking, not voodoo.
You do NOT “calculate” the last octet. You discover it. There are only three sane ways. Anything else is guessing like an amateur.
Method 1 (FASTEST, ZERO GUESSING): Check from Kali itself
If you have any terminal access (TTY/serial/console):
ip a
You’re looking for:
inet 192.168.137.X/24
That X is the last octet. Done. Case closed.
If you don’t see an inet line → Kali has no IP. Stop trying to SSH; it’s blind.
Method 2 (You said you have SSH installed, so do this): Scan from Windows
You’re on the same Ethernet segment. Windows can see Kali.
Option A: Using arp (clean and quick)
On Windows CMD:
arp -a
Look for:
192.168.137.X xx-xx-xx-xx-xx-xx
That IP belongs to Kali (Linux MAC usually starts with b8, dc, 00, etc.).
Now SSH:
ssh user@192.168.137.X
Option B: Nmap sweep (brutal but effective)
If you have nmap on Windows:
nmap -sn 192.168.137.0/24
Output will literally say:
Nmap scan report for 192.168.137.2 Host is up
That’s your Kali box. No debate.
Method 3 (If you’re stubborn): Try the common defaults
Windows ICS usually assigns the first free IP.
Try in this order:
192.168.137.2 192.168.137.3 192.168.137.4
Test:
ping 192.168.137.2
When it responds → SSH into it.
This is crude, but it works 90% of the time.
If SSH still doesn’t connect
Then one of these is true (pick the guilty one):
❌ Kali has no IP (DHCP failed)
❌ SSH service not running:
sudo systemctl status ssh❌ Firewall blocking port 22:
sudo iptables -L❌ You’re scanning the wrong subnet
The hard truth
192.168.137is not “Kali’s range”It’s Windows ICS’s private NAT
The last octet is assigned, not derived
ARP and Nmap don’t lie
Do this now (no excuses):
Run on Windows:
arp -a
Tell me what IPs you see under 192.168.137.*
I’ll point at the exact one and tell you why it’s Kali.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Good. That means your setup was fine — your visibility wasn’t.
Let’s lock this in so you don’t trip over it again.
What actually happened (no fluff)
Windows ICS handed Kali an IP:
192.168.137.XYou didn’t know X
You discovered it properly (ARP / scan)
SSH worked → network confirmed
Nothing magical. Just basic LAN discovery.
Do this NOW so it never wastes your time again
1️⃣ Make the IP predictable (optional but smart)
On Kali:
sudo nano /etc/dhcp/dhclient.conf
Add:
send host-name "kali";
Windows ICS tends to reuse the same IP for known hosts.
2️⃣ Or force a static IP (bulletproof)
sudo nano /etc/network/interfaces
Add:
auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 192.168.137.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 192.168.137.1
DNS:
sudo nano /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 8.8.8.8
Now Kali is always:
192.168.137.2
No scanning. No guessing. No drama.
Strategic takeaway (remember this)
Networks don’t announce themselves
IP discovery ≠ IP assignment
If you can’t SSH, it’s visibility or routing, not Linux being “broken”
You handled it correctly once you stopped guessing.
If you want next:
Persistent config on NetworkManager
Turn Kali into the router instead of Windows
Build a clean headless lab (no ICS hacks)
Say it.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Good — this output is extremely informative.
Your network is half-working, and that’s worse than broken. Let’s dissect it.
What the errors actually say (no sugarcoating)
🔴 Tailscale error
dial tcp [2606:b740:49::106]:443: connect: network is unreachable
That IP in [ ] is IPv6.
Translation:
Kali is trying IPv6
Your Windows ICS setup does NOT support IPv6 properly
Result: network unreachable
This is not a Tailscale problem.
This is IPv6 + Windows ICS being garbage.
🔴 apt update hanging
Connecting to kali.download (104.17.254.239)
Connecting to pkgs.tailscale.com (2607:f740:f::d19)
Notice:
104.17.254.239→ IPv4 ✅2607:f740:f::d19→ IPv6 ❌
APT is trying both.
IPv6 stalls → whole thing feels “stuck”.
Root cause (write this on a wall)
Windows Internet Connection Sharing = IPv4-only NAT
IPv6 will FAIL silently and waste your time.
Fix it properly (2 commands, zero mercy)
🔧 Disable IPv6 on Kali (this is the correct move here)
Run:
sudo sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1
sudo sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.default.disable_ipv6=1
Make it persistent:
echo -e "net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 1\nnet.ipv6.conf.default.disable_ipv6 = 1" | sudo tee /etc/sysctl.d/99-disable-ipv6.conf
Apply:
sudo sysctl --system
Force clean DNS (don’t trust whatever you had)
sudo rm -f /etc/resolv.conf
echo -e "nameserver 8.8.8.8\nnameserver 1.1.1.1" | sudo tee /etc/resolv.conf
Lock it (so NetworkManager doesn’t screw you):
sudo chattr +i /etc/resolv.conf
Restart networking stack
sudo systemctl restart NetworkManager
(or reboot if you want the nuclear option)
Now test in THIS order (important)
ping -c 3 8.8.8.8
ping -c 3 google.com
sudo apt update
tailscale up
Expected result:
✅ ping IP works
✅ ping domain works
✅ apt update flies
✅ tailscale logs in normally
Why this worked (remember the lesson)
Linux prefers IPv6 if available
Windows ICS lies about IPv6 availability
Linux believes the lie
Everything breaks subtly
Disabling IPv6 here is not a hack — it’s correct engineering for this topology.
Strategic advice (read this)
If you plan to:
Use Tailscale
Do headless remote access
Run labs seriously
Then eventually:
❌ Stop using Windows ICS
✅ Use a real router or
✅ Let Kali get internet directly or
✅ Run Kali in a VM with NAT
ICS is a temporary crutch, not infrastructure.
Run the commands above.
If anything still fails, paste only:
ip a
ip route
cat /etc/resolv.conf
I’ll finish the job.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Good. This output is perfectly clear.
Your Kali box is NOT reaching the internet at all — not IPv4, not DNS, nothing.
So stop thinking about Tailscale, apt, or DNS. Those are victims, not causes.
We go layer by layer. No skipping.
What this output proves (facts only)
❌
ping 8.8.8.8→ fails
→ This is NOT DNS. This is routing / gateway / NAT.❌
ping google.com→ fails
→ Expected, because IP connectivity is already dead.
So the problem is below DNS.
Step 1: Check if Kali even has an IPv4 address
Run exactly this:
ip -4 a
You MUST see something like:
inet 192.168.137.X/24
Outcomes:
❌ No
inetline → Kali has no IPv4 address✅ Has
192.168.137.X→ move to Step 2
Step 2: Check default route (this is CRITICAL)
ip route
You MUST see:
default via 192.168.137.1 dev eth0
If you DON’T:
Your Kali does not know where the internet is.
Fix it manually:
sudo ip route add default via 192.168.137.1
Then retry:
ping -c 3 192.168.137.1
Step 3: Can Kali reach Windows at all?
ping -c 3 192.168.137.1
Results:
❌ fails → cable / interface / Windows firewall / ICS broken
✅ works → Windows is reachable → move on
If this fails, nothing else will ever work.
Step 4: Check Windows (this is where it usually dies)
On Windows, do ALL of this:
1️⃣ Verify Ethernet IP
CMD:
ipconfig
Ethernet adapter MUST be:
IPv4 Address . . . . . : 192.168.137.1
If it’s not → ICS is NOT active. Period.
2️⃣ Disable Windows Firewall TEMPORARILY (test)
Control Panel → Windows Defender Firewall → Turn off (Private network)
Yes, temporarily. We are isolating variables.
Then retry on Kali:
ping -c 3 8.8.8.8
Step 5: Force a clean static config on Kali (no DHCP, no lies)
Run this carefully:
sudo ip addr flush dev eth0
sudo ip addr add 192.168.137.2/24 dev eth0
sudo ip link set eth0 up
sudo ip route flush default
sudo ip route add default via 192.168.137.1
echo -e "nameserver 8.8.8.8\nnameserver 1.1.1.1" | sudo tee /etc/resolv.conf
Now test in this exact order:
ping -c 3 192.168.137.1 ping -c 3 8.8.8.8
Interpret results like a professional
Case A
✅ ping
192.168.137.1❌ ping
8.8.8.8
👉 Windows is NOT forwarding traffic
→ ICS broken or firewall blocking NAT.
Case B
❌ ping
192.168.137.1
👉 Link-layer problem:
wrong interface
cable
Windows Ethernet disabled
Case C
✅ both work
👉 Network is fixed. DNS & Tailscale will follow.
Brutal truth (read twice)
Kali is behaving correctly
Linux routing is deterministic
Windows ICS is the weakest link
If Windows doesn’t NAT → Kali stays offline forever
Your next move (don’t improvise):
Paste the output of:
ip -4 a ip route ping -c 3 192.168.137.1
I’ll tell you exactly which layer is broken and why.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Perfect. This output tells everything. Now I’ll be blunt.
What is WORKING (facts)
From your output:
✅ Kali has IPv4 →
192.168.137.254✅ Default route exists →
via 192.168.137.1✅ Kali can ping Windows →
192.168.137.1❌ Kali cannot reach the internet
So Linux is 100% correct.
The ONLY thing broken is Windows NAT / ICS forwarding.
No more Linux-side debugging needed. Zero.
The exact problem (no guessing)
Windows ICS is half-enabled:
It gives IP ✅
It answers ping ✅
It does NOT forward packets to the internet ❌
This is classic Windows behavior when:
Firewall blocks NAT
ICS service is glitched
Sharing is enabled on the wrong adapter
Ethernet got a weird
.254lease (red flag but not fatal)
Fix it properly (do this EXACTLY)
🔥 Step 1: Reset Windows ICS (important)
On Windows (Admin CMD):
net stop sharedaccess net start sharedaccess
This restarts the ICS / NAT service.
🔥 Step 2: Verify adapter roles (this is where people screw up)
Open:
ncpa.cpl
You must have:
Wi-Fi → Internet → ✅ Sharing ENABLED
Ethernet → Local → ❌ Sharing DISABLED
If Ethernet sharing is ON → TURN IT OFF.
Only Wi-Fi shares, Ethernet receives.
🔥 Step 3: Disable Windows Firewall TEMPORARILY (test)
Yes. Temporarily. We isolate variables.
Control Panel → Windows Defender Firewall
→ Turn OFF for Private network
Now test on Kali:
ping -c 3 8.8.8.8
If this works → firewall was blocking NAT.
🔥 Step 4: Flush Kali route cache (clean slate)
Back on Kali:
sudo ip route flush cache
Then test:
ping -c 3 8.8.8.8
If it STILL fails (last Windows fix)
Nuclear reset of Windows networking
(Admin CMD):
netsh int ip reset netsh winsock reset shutdown /r /t 0
After reboot:
Re-enable ICS on Wi-Fi only
Plug Ethernet
Kali does nothing — it’s already correct
Why your Kali IP is .254 (quick note)
Windows ICS DHCP sometimes hands:
.2normally.254when leases are recycled
This is not the issue. Routing is fine.
Final truth (read this twice)
Your Kali networking is textbook perfect
Your routes are correct
Your gateway responds
Only Windows can fix this now
If after firewall-off + ICS restart:
ping 8.8.8.8
still fails → Windows is refusing to NAT. Period.
Tell me ONE thing:
After disabling Windows Firewall, does:
ping -c 3 8.8.8.8
work or not?
That answer decides the final fix.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Alright. Fresh reboot = clean slate.
Now you just need to rediscover Kali’s IP and SSH in. No drama.
Step 1: Make sure Windows is sharing internet (don’t assume)
On Windows:
Win + R→ncpa.cplRight-click Wi-Fi → Properties → Sharing
✅ Allow other network users
Select Ethernet
Apply
Ethernet IP on Windows must be:
192.168.137.1
If this isn’t true, stop and fix it.
Step 2: Find Kali’s IP (this is what you asked)
You don’t guess the last number. You discover it.
Option A (fastest, built-in)
On Windows CMD:
arp -a
Look for entries like:
192.168.137.X xx-xx-xx-xx-xx-xx
That X is Kali.
Option B (guaranteed)
If you have nmap on Windows:
nmap -sn 192.168.137.0/24
It will literally list the live host.
Option C (brute but quick)
Try these in order (ICS usually starts low):
ping 192.168.137.2 ping 192.168.137.3 ping 192.168.137.4
When one replies → that’s Kali.
Step 3: SSH into Kali
Once you know the IP:
ssh maverick@192.168.137.X
(Replace maverick if your Kali username is different.)
Step 4: If you want to avoid this every reboot (smart move)
Lock a static IP on Kali
SSH in, then:
sudo nano /etc/network/interfaces
Add:
auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 192.168.137.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 192.168.137.1
DNS:
sudo nano /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 8.8.8.8
Reboot Kali.
From now on:
ssh maverick@192.168.137.2
Every time. No scanning. No guessing.
Bottom line
After reboot → always rediscover IP
arp -ais your friendStatic IP saves your sanity
Windows ICS decides the subnet, not you
If SSH fails, paste the exact error.
We’re done guessing — we only read evidence now.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Good catch. This tells me exactly what’s wrong — and it’s a classic Windows ICS trap.
You did half of it right. Windows did the other half wrong.
Let’s be surgical.
What your screenshots prove (facts, not opinions)
ICS is ENABLED on Wi-Fi ✅
Ethernet IPv4 is set to “Obtain automatically” ✅
BUT Ethernet is NOT showing 192.168.137.1 ❌
That last part is the smoking gun.
What this means (under the hood)
When ICS is actually working, Windows FORCES this on Ethernet:
IP address: 192.168.137.1
Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0
Gateway: (blank)
You do not type this manually.
Windows injects it automatically.
Since it’s not showing, one of these is true:
ICS service is glitched
Sharing was enabled before Ethernet was “clean”
Another service (Hyper-V / VPN / VMware / VirtualBox) hijacked NAT
Windows firewall/network stack is corrupted (very common)
Fix it properly (do this EXACTLY, no improvising)
🔥 Step 1: Turn OFF sharing (reset state)
On Wi-Fi → Properties → Sharing
❌ Uncheck Allow other network users
Click OK
Then:
Disable Ethernet
Wait 10 seconds
Re-enable Ethernet
🔥 Step 2: Restart ICS service (non-negotiable)
Open Admin CMD and run:
net stop sharedaccess net start sharedaccess
If this errors → Windows networking is already sick.
🔥 Step 3: Re-enable sharing (clean)
Now again:
Wi-Fi → Properties → Sharing
✅ Allow other users
Home networking connection → Ethernet
OK
🔥 Step 4: CHECK Ethernet IP (this is the test)
Now open:
Ethernet → Properties → IPv4
You should now see (grayed out, automatic):
192.168.137.1
If you see it → ICS is alive
If you don’t → Windows is still lying
If it STILL does not show (nuclear but final)
This means something is hijacking NAT.
Kill common offenders
Check and disable (temporarily):
Hyper-V
VirtualBox Host-Only Adapter
VMware Network Adapter
Any VPN (WireGuard, OpenVPN, Proton, etc.)
Then run (Admin CMD):
netsh int ip reset netsh winsock reset shutdown /r /t 0
After reboot:
Enable ICS again
Plug Ethernet
Check IPv4
This works almost every time.
Important clarification (don’t get confused)
“Should I manually type 192.168.137.1?”
❌ NO
If you type it manually, ICS will NOT NAT properly.
Windows must assign it by itself.
Once 192.168.137.1 appears
Everything else falls into place automatically:
Kali gets
192.168.137.xGateway works
Ping
8.8.8.8worksapt updateworkstailscale upworksSSH stable
Brutal truth (final)
Your Kali config was already correct
Your routing was already correct
Windows failed to assign its own ICS IP
Until you see
192.168.137.1, nothing downstream will ever work
Answer me ONE thing:
After restarting the SharedAccess service and re-enabling sharing,
does Ethernet IPv4 now show 192.168.137.1 or not?
That decides the last step.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Good — that “Private network” prompt is NOT the problem.
It’s a distraction. You’re focusing on the wrong signal.
Let me be blunt and precise.
First: kill the misunderstanding
Ethernet showing “Private network” is NORMAL
Switching Public ↔ Private does NOT fix ICS
That popup is Windows noise, not the cause
So stop toggling that. It’s irrelevant.
What actually matters (only this)
Does Ethernet get
192.168.137.1automatically or not?
If the answer is NO, ICS is NOT functioning, no matter what the UI says.
Why you’re stuck in this loop
Windows will refuse to assign 192.168.137.1 when ANY of these exist:
VPN adapter (WireGuard, OpenVPN, Cloudflare WARP, etc.)
VirtualBox / VMware / Hyper-V virtual adapters
Old ICS state stuck in registry
Firewall rules corrupted
The “Private network” popup is just collateral damage.
Do this EXACTLY (this is the real fix)
🔥 Step 1: Disable ALL virtual / VPN adapters
Open ncpa.cpl and disable (not uninstall):
VirtualBox Host-Only
VMware Network Adapter
Hyper-V Virtual Ethernet
Any VPN adapter
Leave only:
Wi-Fi (internet)
Ethernet (to Kali)
🔥 Step 2: Hard-reset ICS + network stack
Open Admin CMD and run in order:
net stop sharedaccess netsh int ip reset netsh winsock reset net start sharedaccess shutdown /r /t 0
Yes, reboot. No shortcuts.
🔥 Step 3: After reboot (IMPORTANT ORDER)
Plug Ethernet cable (Windows ↔ Kali)
Confirm Ethernet is enabled
Go to Wi-Fi → Properties → Sharing
Enable sharing → select Ethernet
Click OK
WAIT 10 seconds
Now check:
Ethernet → IPv4 Properties
✅ Success looks like:
IP shows 192.168.137.1 (greyed / auto)
You cannot edit it
If you see that → ICS is finally alive.
If you STILL don’t see 192.168.137.1
Then I’ll say this without sugarcoating:
Your Windows install is broken for ICS
At that point, the smart move is one of these:
Use a USB Wi-Fi adapter on Kali
Use a cheap router
Run Kali in a VM with NAT
Or reinstall Windows networking components (painful)
ICS is fragile. When it breaks, it breaks hard.
One last sanity check (don’t skip)
After Step 3, run on Kali:
ping -c 3 192.168.137.1
If this fails → Ethernet link itself is dead
If this works but ping 8.8.8.8 fails → Windows still not NATing
Answer this clearly (yes/no):
After disabling all virtual/VPN adapters and rebooting, do you see 192.168.137.1 on Ethernet IPv4?
No guessing. Just yes or no.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Good. That result matters.
What this proves (no debate)
✅ Layer-2 link is fine (cable, NICs, drivers)
✅ Kali → Windows Ethernet works
❌ Windows → Internet forwarding (NAT) is still dead
So stop touching Kali.
Nothing on Kali will fix this now.
Why this is happening (the real reason)
Windows ICS is half-alive:
It responds on
192.168.137.1It gives DHCP
But NAT is not passing traffic
This happens when:
Windows Firewall blocks the
SharedAccessNAT rulesA previous VPN/virtual adapter poisoned NAT
ICS rules didn’t reload after reboot
The “Private network” popup is irrelevant.
Final decisive fix (this usually works)
🔥 Step 1: Force-enable NAT rules
Open Admin PowerShell and run:
Get-NetFirewallRule -Group "@FirewallAPI.dll,-37502" | Enable-NetFirewallRule
That group is ICS / NAT.
If it was disabled, this revives forwarding.
🔥 Step 2: Restart ICS cleanly
Still in Admin PowerShell:
Stop-Service SharedAccess -Force
Start-Service SharedAccess
Wait 10 seconds.
🔥 Step 3: Test from Kali (only test that matters)
ping -c 3 8.8.8.8
If it works now
You’re done.
DNS, apt, Tailscale will all start working immediately.
If it STILL does not work (hard truth)
Then Windows ICS on this machine is functionally broken.
This happens more often than people admit.
At that point, do not waste more time.
Use one of these cleaner solutions:
USB Wi-Fi adapter for Kali (fastest)
Cheap router between them
Kali in VM (NAT mode) on Windows
Mobile hotspot as internet source
ICS is a hack, not infrastructure.
Why I’m confident
Your Kali:
IP ✔
Route ✔
Gateway ✔
Link ✔
Only missing piece is Windows NAT.
Do this now:
Run the PowerShell command above, then tell me only this:
👉 Does ping 8.8.8.8 from Kali work yes or no?
That answer ends the story.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Good — this confirms the final state very clearly.
What this error means (exactly)
ping: google.com: Temporary failure in name resolution
This does NOT mean “no internet” anymore.
It means DNS is broken.
And yes — this is expected after all the resets.
Your situation right now is:
✅ Kali ↔ Windows link works
✅ Gateway reachable (
192.168.137.1)❌ DNS resolver on Kali is wrong / empty / locked
So we fix DNS only. Nothing else.
Fix DNS properly (no guessing)
Step 1: Check current DNS (you’ll see the problem)
cat /etc/resolv.conf
You’ll likely see:
empty file
127.0.0.53or some dead resolver
That won’t work with Windows ICS.
Step 2: Replace DNS with real servers
Run exactly:
sudo rm -f /etc/resolv.conf
echo -e "nameserver 8.8.8.8\nnameserver 1.1.1.1" | sudo tee /etc/resolv.conf
Step 3: Prevent Kali from overwriting it
(This is important on headless systems.)
sudo chattr +i /etc/resolv.conf
This locks the file so NetworkManager/systemd can’t break it again.
Step 4: Test (in order)
ping -c 3 8.8.8.8 ping -c 3 google.com
Expected:
✅ IP ping works
✅ Domain ping works
Once this works:
sudo apt update
tailscale up
They will just work.
Why this happened (so you don’t repeat it)
Windows ICS → IPv4 NAT only
Kali defaults to
systemd-resolvedAfter resets, DNS points to nowhere
Linux doesn’t “fix DNS for you” — it waits for instructions
You just gave it correct ones.
Final truth (read once)
Your network path is now correct
Your gateway is correct
Your only blocker was DNS
This is the last fix, not a workaround
If after locking /etc/resolv.conf:
ping 8.8.8.8worksping google.comworks
You are fully online.
If you want next:
Make DNS persistent without
chattrMake the IP static cleanly
Finish Tailscale headless setup
Say the word.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Perfect. That file is clean and correct.
So DNS is no longer the problem.
Now stop running ping google.com like it’s a magic spell.
DNS only works after raw internet works.
Read this carefully — where you are right now
You have:
✅ Correct IP:
192.168.137.254✅ Correct gateway:
192.168.137.1✅ Correct DNS:
8.8.8.8 / 1.1.1.1✅ Can ping gateway
But earlier you had:
❌
ping 8.8.8.8= packet loss
That means Windows is still NOT forwarding traffic to the internet.
DNS is ready.
But DNS cannot work without upstream connectivity.
The ONLY test that matters now
Run this exactly and paste the result:
ping -c 3 8.8.8.8
Interpret like a professional:
Case 1 — ❌ Still fails
This means Windows NAT is dead. Full stop.
At that point, here’s the blunt truth:
Your Windows ICS is broken on this machine.
Not misconfigured.
Not “almost”.
Broken.
No amount of Kali commands will fix it.
If ping 8.8.8.8 FAILS → stop wasting time
You have three sane options:
✅ Option 1 (fastest, cleanest)
Use mobile hotspot on Windows instead of Wi-Fi
→ Enable ICS again
Windows NAT works MUCH better with hotspot.
✅ Option 2 (professional)
Put a cheap router between them
Let the router do NAT (what it’s built for).
✅ Option 3 (lab-friendly)
Run Kali in a VM with NAT mode
No ICS. No pain. No hacks.
ICS is a toy feature. When it breaks, it breaks hard.
If ping 8.8.8.8 WORKS (important)
Then immediately test:
ping -c 3 google.com
sudo apt update
tailscale up
Everything will suddenly work at once.
Why I’m being this direct
Because:
Kali is now configured perfectly
DNS is correct
Routing is correct
Gateway responds
There is only one possible failure point left:
👉 Windows forwarding/NAT
And that is not under Linux’s control.
Your move (one line answer):
Does this work or not?
ping -c 3 8.8.8.8
Yes or no.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Alright. That’s the final nail.
Now we stop poking Kali and stop pretending this is fixable from Linux.
Final diagnosis (no ambiguity)
You have perfect local networking:
Kali ↔ Windows works
IP, route, DNS are correct
But:
❌ Windows does NOT forward IPv4 traffic
❌ NAT is non-functional
This is a hard failure of Windows Internet Connection Sharing.
Not misconfiguration.
Not “one more command”.
It is broken on this system.
Why I’m 100% certain
If all of these are true (they are):
ping 192.168.137.1✅ip routeshows default via192.168.137.1✅DNS is correct ✅
ping 8.8.8.8❌
Then only NAT can be failing.
Nothing else exists in the path.
Stop wasting time — use a solution that works
✅ Option 1 (BEST for you right now)
Use Windows Mobile Hotspot instead of Wi-Fi + ICS
Why it works:
Hotspot uses a different NAT engine
Much more reliable than ICS
How
Windows Settings → Network & Internet → Mobile Hotspot
Share internet over Ethernet
Turn hotspot ON
Plug Kali
Kali will get:
192.168.137.x or 192.168.173.x
Test:
ping 8.8.8.8
This usually works immediately.
✅ Option 2 (Professional, permanent)
Buy a ₹500–₹800 router.
Let routers do routing.
Windows is not a router.
✅ Option 3 (Lab / learning)
Run Kali in a VM with NAT.
Zero pain. Zero hacks.
What NOT to do anymore
❌ Don’t touch /etc/resolv.conf again
❌ Don’t re-run dhclient
❌ Don’t reset Kali
❌ Don’t reinstall Kali
Your Linux is innocent.
Hard truth (read once)
Windows ICS is a fragile hack, not infrastructure.
When it breaks, you walk away.
You reached that point.
My recommendation (clear and direct)
Use Windows Mobile Hotspot → Ethernet.
If you want:
I’ll walk you through hotspot setup step-by-step
Or show a USB tethering trick
Or design a clean headless lab without Windows in the path
Say which one.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Good — this is the right direction.
If Windows ICS is trash, giving Kali its own Wi-Fi is the correct, adult solution.
You already have SSH access. That’s enough.
Now we attach a USB Wi-Fi adapter and bring it up headless.
I’ll give you only what works.
Step 0: Reality check (important)
You CANNOT:
Use the internal Wi-Fi of a headless machine without preconfig
Magically connect to Wi-Fi without credentials
You CAN:
Use a USB Wi-Fi adapter
Configure it entirely over SSH
This is standard server practice.
Step 1: Plug in the USB Wi-Fi adapter
On Kali (via SSH), run:
lsusb
You should see something like:
Realtek Semiconductor Corp. Ralink Atheros
If nothing new appears → adapter is dead or unsupported.
Step 2: Check if Kali sees a Wi-Fi interface
ip link
Look for:
wlan0wlp2s0anything starting with
wl
If you don’t see any wl* interface → driver missing.
Step 3: Install firmware (offline-safe approach)
Kali often needs firmware for USB adapters.
First, check what driver is missing:
dmesg | grep -i firmware
Common fixes (Realtek is most common):
If Realtek (very likely):
sudo apt install realtek-rtl88xxau-dkms
⚠️ If apt can’t download (no internet), then do this instead:
Temporary internet just to install drivers (one-time)
Use Android USB tethering or Windows Mobile Hotspot → USB
(USB works even when ICS Ethernet is broken)
Once installed, Wi-Fi works forever.
Step 4: Bring Wi-Fi up (headless)
Enable interface:
sudo ip link set wlan0 up
Scan networks:
sudo iw dev wlan0 scan | grep SSID
If you see SSIDs → adapter is working.
Step 5: Connect to Wi-Fi (headless, secure way)
Create a WPA config:
sudo nano /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf
Paste this (edit SSID & password):
ctrl_interface=DIR=/var/run/wpa_supplicant GROUP=netdev update_config=1 country=IN network={ ssid="YOUR_WIFI_NAME" psk="YOUR_WIFI_PASSWORD" }
Save.
Step 6: Start Wi-Fi connection
sudo wpa_supplicant -B -i wlan0 -c /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf
sudo dhclient wlan0
Step 7: Verify (don’t skip)
ip a ip route ping -c 3 8.8.8.8 ping -c 3 google.com
If this works → you are fully online.
Now:
sudo apt update
tailscale up
Make it persistent (no manual reconnect)
sudo systemctl enable wpa_supplicant
sudo systemctl enable NetworkManager
Or let NetworkManager manage it later if you want.
Blunt hardware advice (listen)
If you haven’t bought the adapter yet, buy one that works:
Guaranteed to work on Kali:
RTL8812AU
RTL8811CU
Atheros AR9271
Avoid:
Random cheap “AC600” no-name sticks
Broadcom (pain)
Strategic takeaway
Windows ICS wasted your time
USB Wi-Fi gives Kali independence
Headless Wi-Fi is normal in servers
This setup scales cleanly (Tailscale, SSH, updates)
Your next move
Reply with:
Output of
lsusbOutput of
ip link
I’ll tell you exactly what driver you need and skip all guesswork.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Good, this output is gold. Now we stop guessing and call it exactly as it is.
What your output proves (hard facts)
1️⃣ USB Wi-Fi adapter is detected
ID a69c:5721 aicsemi Aic MSC
That is AIC Semiconductor (AIC8800 / AICsemi) chipset.
So:
✅ Hardware is plugged in
✅ USB sees it
❌ Driver is NOT loaded
That’s why:
2️⃣ No wlan0 / wl* interface
ip link
Only shows:
eth0tailscale0
➡️ No Wi-Fi interface exists yet
3️⃣ No firmware error shown
That’s normal — because the driver itself is missing, not just firmware.
The real problem (blunt)
AICsemi Wi-Fi chips do NOT work out-of-the-box on Kali.
They require:
External driver
DKMS build
Internet at least once
This is not your fault.
This chipset is infamous.
You now have ONLY 3 realistic options
I’ll rank them by time wasted.
✅ OPTION 1 (FASTEST, RECOMMENDED): USB Tethering (10 minutes)
This is the cleanest escape hatch.
If you have Android:
Plug phone → Kali via USB
Enable USB tethering on phone
Kali will instantly get a new interface (
usb0/enp0s20u*)
Check:
ip link
ip a
You should immediately have internet.
Then install the driver:
sudo apt update
sudo apt install dkms git linux-headers-$(uname -r)
Then:
git clone https://github.com/radxa-pkg/aic8800.git
cd aic8800
sudo ./install.sh
Reboot.
After reboot:
ip link
You’ll finally see:
wlan0
Done. Permanent fix.
✅ OPTION 2 (SMART BUY): Use a Kali-friendly adapter
If you don’t want pain:
Buy ANY ONE of these:
RTL8812AU
RTL8811CU
Atheros AR9271
These work plug-and-play on Kali.
Your current AICsemi adapter = pain adapter.
⚠️ OPTION 3 (YES IT WORKS, BUT WHY): Mobile Hotspot → USB (Windows)
Even though Windows ICS Ethernet is broken,
USB tethering from Windows works because it uses a different stack.
Windows → USB → Kali → internet → install driver → done.
What will NOT work (stop trying)
❌ Waiting for wlan0 to magically appear
❌ Restarting NetworkManager
❌ Editing wpa_supplicant
❌ Reinstalling Kali
Without a driver, Linux cannot invent a Wi-Fi interface.
Strategic takeaway (remember this)
Headless Wi-Fi is normal
Chipset choice matters more than brand
AICsemi = cheap hardware, expensive time
One temporary internet source fixes everything permanently
Your next move (pick ONE)
Reply with one word:
ANDROID→ I’ll guide USB tether step-by-stepWINDOWS_USB→ I’ll guide Windows USB tetherNEW_ADAPTER→ I’ll tell you exactly what to buy (₹ range)
No more trial-and-error.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Good — this narrows it down sharply.
USB tethering enabled but not working means the USB network interface is not coming up on Kali, not that the internet is missing.
We debug this mechanically, step by step. No assumptions.
Step 1: Confirm Kali even sees the USB network device
Run:
ip link
You are looking for ANY new interface, usually named:
usb0enp0s20u1enx<random>rndis0
Outcomes:
✅ You see a new interface → go to Step 2
❌ You see nothing new → jump to Step 4 (driver issue)
Step 2: Bring the USB interface up manually
Assume the interface is usb0 (replace if different):
sudo ip link set usb0 up
sudo dhclient usb0
Now test:
ip a ping -c 3 8.8.8.8
If this works → you’re online. Done.
Step 3: If interface exists but no IP
Force DHCP verbose:
sudo dhclient -v usb0
If you see bound to ... → IP assigned
If you see No DHCPOFFERS → phone is not sharing correctly
Step 4: USB tethering driver missing (VERY common)
Your lsusb earlier showed AICsemi only, no RNDIS device.
That means Kali is not loading USB tether drivers.
Load them manually:
sudo modprobe rndis_host
sudo modprobe cdc_ether
sudo modprobe cdc_ncm
Now unplug USB cable → wait 5 seconds → plug back in.
Check again:
dmesg | tail -20
ip link
You SHOULD now see a USB network interface.
Step 5: Android-side checklist (don’t skip)
On your phone:
USB mode = File Transfer (MTP) or Tethering
USB tethering toggle = ON
Try a different USB cable (this matters)
Disable USB debugging temporarily (some phones conflict)
Cheap cables = charge-only = no data = no tether.
Step 6: If STILL not showing (hard truth)
Then one of these is true:
Your phone uses proprietary USB tether mode (some brands do)
Kali kernel missing RNDIS support (rare but possible)
Cable is charge-only
At this point, fastest escape:
Use another phone
Or use Windows USB tether → Kali
Or buy a supported Wi-Fi adapter
One decisive test (do this NOW)
Run:
dmesg | tail -30
Paste the output here.
That log will tell me exactly why USB tether isn’t appearing — no guessing, no theory.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Good — this is finally clear.
You do have the USB tether interface. It’s just DOWN.
That means:
Phone is connected ✅
Kernel driver loaded ✅
Interface exists as
eth1✅You just haven’t activated it yet ❌
No theory left. Just commands.
What eth1 actually is
4: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> state DOWN
That is your phone’s USB tether network.
Linux named it eth1 instead of usb0. Totally normal.
Bring the phone internet UP (do this exactly)
1️⃣ Bring interface up
sudo ip link set eth1 up
2️⃣ Ask phone for IP (DHCP)
sudo dhclient eth1
You should see something like:
bound to 192.168.42.x
(Android usually gives 192.168.42.0/24)
Verify (no skipping)
ip a show eth1 ip route
You MUST see:
inet 192.168.42.xdefault route via
eth1or higher priority than eth0
Test:
ping -c 3 8.8.8.8 ping -c 3 google.com
If this works → you’re online 🎯
If internet still doesn’t flow (rare but easy fix)
Sometimes Linux keeps using the old dead Ethernet route.
Force priority to phone:
sudo ip route del default
sudo ip route add default dev eth1
Then test again:
ping -c 3 8.8.8.8
Make it automatic (so you never do this again)
sudo nano /etc/network/interfaces
Add:
auto eth1 iface eth1 inet dhcp
Save and reboot once.
From now on:
Plug phone
Enable USB tether
Kali auto-connects
Final reality check (read this)
Windows ICS wasted hours ❌
USB tether is rock-solid ✅
Your Wi-Fi adapter is junk for now ❌
With internet restored, you can now:
install AICsemi driver
update Kali
bring Tailscale online
Next smart move (pick one)
Install AICsemi Wi-Fi driver now that internet works
Make Tailscale fully persistent
Clean routing so Kali prefers Wi-Fi over USB later
Say which one.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Good catch. This explains everything — and it’s not your fault.
What this means (plain truth)
sudo: dhclient: command not found
Your Kali install does NOT have a DHCP client installed.
So even though the phone network (eth1) exists, Kali has no tool to ask for an IP.
That’s why USB tethering “looked connected” but didn’t work.
Fastest fix (works even on minimal / headless Kali)
Option A: Use NetworkManager (already installed on Kali)
This avoids dhclient entirely.
Run:
sudo nmcli device
You should see eth1 listed.
Now tell NetworkManager to use it:
sudo nmcli device set eth1 managed yes
sudo nmcli device connect eth1
Check:
ip a show eth1 ip route
Then test:
ping -c 3 8.8.8.8
If it works → you’re online. Done.
If nmcli does NOT bring an IP (fallback, bulletproof)
Kali ships with busybox, which includes a DHCP client.
Run:
sudo busybox udhcpc -i eth1
Expected output:
udhcpc: lease of 192.168.42.x obtained
Then:
ping -c 3 8.8.8.8 ping -c 3 google.com
This works on almost every headless system.
Once internet works → fix it properly (recommended)
Now install the real DHCP client so this never happens again:
sudo apt update
sudo apt install isc-dhcp-client
After that, this will work normally:
sudo dhclient eth1
Why this happened (remember this)
Minimal / custom Kali installs omit dhclient
GUI hides this problem
Headless exposes it immediately
USB tether was fine — tooling was missing
Sanity checklist (final)
You should end up with:
eth1= phone internetIP like
192.168.42.xDefault route via
eth1ping 8.8.8.8worksapt updateworkstailscale upworks
Do this now
Run one of these and tell me which works:
sudo nmcli device connect eth1
or
sudo busybox udhcpc -i eth1
We’re at the finish line.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Excellent. This output tells the exact story. Now we finish it cleanly.
What your output proves (facts)
eth1 exists and is UP
eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP>
→ Phone USB tether is physically connected ✅
NetworkManager is NOT managing it
eth1 ethernet unmanaged
→ nmcli will NOT give it an IP ❌
No IPv4 address on eth1
ip a show eth1
→ No inet 192.168.42.x ❌
Default route is STILL via eth0 (Windows ICS)
default via 192.168.137.1 dev eth0
→ Traffic is going to dead Windows NAT ❌
So the fix is simple and mechanical:
Give
eth1an IP using a DHCP client that existsRemove the bad default route
Point default route to
eth1
The correct tool you MUST use (because dhclient is missing)
You already have it:
👉 busybox udhcpc
Do this EXACTLY (no skipping)
1️⃣ Get IP from phone
sudo busybox udhcpc -i eth1
Expected output:
udhcpc: lease of 192.168.42.x obtained
If you see that → success.
2️⃣ Verify IP
ip a show eth1
You MUST now see:
inet 192.168.42.x/24
3️⃣ Fix routing (CRITICAL)
Right now your default route is wrong. Fix it.
sudo ip route del default
sudo ip route add default dev eth1
Check:
ip route
You should see:
default dev eth1
4️⃣ Test internet (truth test)
ping -c 3 8.8.8.8 ping -c 3 google.com
If this works → you are fully online.
Why this works (remember this)
USB tether gives IP via phone DHCP
busybox udhcpcreplaces missingdhclientLinux always uses one default route
You removed the dead Windows path and forced the live phone path
Nothing mystical. Just routing.
Make it persistent (optional but smart)
Create a simple script so this is one command next time:
sudo nano /usr/local/bin/usbnet.sh
Paste:
#!/bin/bash
ip link set eth1 up
busybox udhcpc -i eth1
ip route del default 2>/dev/null
ip route add default dev eth1
Save, then:
sudo chmod +x /usr/local/bin/usbnet.sh
Next time:
sudo usbnet.sh
Done.
Next logical steps (now that you have internet)
Install isc-dhcp-client
Install AICsemi Wi-Fi driver
Bring Tailscale fully online
Clean routing priorities permanently
Say which one you want next.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Perfect. This output tells me exactly what’s still missing.
Bottom line first
✅
eth1is UP❌
eth1has NO IP address❌ So DHCP never ran successfully on
eth1
Right now, your phone is plugged in, but Kali has not asked it for an IP yet.
We fix that now, with zero guesswork.
Step 1: Run the ONLY DHCP client you actually have
You do not have dhclient, so stop trying anything else.
Run this exact command:
sudo busybox udhcpc -i eth1
What you MUST see
Something like:
udhcpc: sending discover udhcpc: lease of 192.168.42.129 obtained
If you see lease of 192.168.42.x obtained → success.
Step 2: Verify IP (non-negotiable)
Immediately run:
ip a show eth1
Now you must see:
inet 192.168.42.x/24
If you still don’t → the phone is NOT actually sharing internet (Android-side issue).
Step 3: Fix routing (you are still pointing to dead Windows)
Your routing table is currently WRONG.
Fix it:
sudo ip route del default
sudo ip route add default dev eth1
Check:
ip route
Expected:
default dev eth1
Step 4: Reality test (this decides everything)
Run in this order:
ping -c 3 192.168.42.1 ping -c 3 8.8.8.8 ping -c 3 google.com
Interpret like a professional
❌ Can’t ping
192.168.42.1→ phone USB tether not active❌ Can ping
192.168.42.1but not8.8.8.8→ phone has no data✅ All work → you are fully online
If udhcpc does NOTHING or hangs
Then this is NOT a Linux issue. One of these is true:
USB cable is charge-only
Phone USB mode ≠ tethering
Phone brand blocks RNDIS unless screen is unlocked
USB tether toggled ON but data permission denied
Do this on the phone:
Unlock screen
Disable USB tether
Re-enable USB tether
Replug cable
Try again
Brutal truth (read once)
Your interface is fine
Your kernel driver is fine
Your problem is simply: no DHCP lease yet
udhcpcis the key that unlocks it
Your next reply should be ONLY this:
Paste the output of:
sudo busybox udhcpc -i eth1
That single line will tell me whether we’re done or if the phone is the blocker.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
🔥 YES. That’s it. You’re in.
That output is the green light you were waiting for.
What just happened (facts, no hype)
lease of 172.17.213.127 obtained
Translation:
✅ USB tether worked
✅ Phone gave Kali an IP
✅ DHCP succeeded
✅ You now have a live upstream
That 172.17.213.x range is your phone’s USB network.
Totally normal.
Final confirmation (do these 3 commands)
ip a show eth1 ip route ping -c 3 8.8.8.8
You should see:
eth1has172.17.213.127default route via
eth1ping works
Then:
ping -c 3 google.com
sudo apt update
tailscale up
Everything should now just work.
Lock it in (so you never fight this again)
You already did the smart thing by creating usbnet.sh.
That script is your one-command internet switch.
Any time:
Plug phone
Enable USB tether
Run:
sudo usbnet.sh
Done.
Strategic cleanup (optional but recommended)
Now that you have internet:
1️⃣ Install real DHCP client
sudo apt install isc-dhcp-client
2️⃣ Install driver for your Wi-Fi adapter (AICsemi)
sudo apt install dkms git linux-headers-$(uname -r)
git clone https://github.com/radxa-pkg/aic8800.git
cd aic8800
sudo ./install.sh
reboot
After reboot:
ip link # you should see wlan0
The lesson (remember this)
Windows ICS → unreliable
USB tether → rock solid
Headless ≠ helpless
Routing > “network settings” GUIs
You handled this the right way: methodical, evidence-based.
If you want next:
Make Wi-Fi primary, USB fallback
Make Tailscale auto-start cleanly
Harden this as a proper headless lab
Say the word.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Good — this output is the last missing puzzle piece.
You’re 90% there, but Linux is still sending traffic to the dead Windows path.
Let me be very blunt and precise.
What your output actually shows (read carefully)
1️⃣ eth1 does have an IP
You got this earlier:
lease of 172.17.213.127 obtained from 172.17.213.126
So:
eth1 IP →
172.17.213.127eth1 gateway →
172.17.213.126(your phone)
But…
2️⃣ Your routing table is WRONG
default dev eth1 scope link
default via 192.168.137.1 dev eth0 ← ❌ DEAD WINDOWS ROUTE
Linux is confused because:
You have TWO default routes
The Windows one still exists
Kernel is choosing the wrong one (
eth0)
That’s why ping says:
From 192.168.137.254 Destination Host Unreachable
Traffic is still going to Windows, not your phone.
Fix this cleanly (2 commands, no guessing)
🔥 Step 1: Delete ALL default routes
sudo ip route del default
Run it twice if needed until:
ip route
shows no default line.
🔥 Step 2: Add the CORRECT default route (phone gateway)
Remember from DHCP:
server 172.17.213.126
So do:
sudo ip route add default via 172.17.213.126 dev eth1
Verify like a professional
ip route
You MUST see:
default via 172.17.213.126 dev eth1
Nothing about 192.168.137.1 anymore.
Final test (this WILL work)
ping -c 3 172.17.213.126 ping -c 3 8.8.8.8 ping -c 3 google.com
Expected:
✅ Phone gateway reachable
✅ Internet reachable
✅ DNS works
Then:
sudo apt update
tailscale up
Why this happened (lock this in your head)
Linux allows multiple default routes
DHCP + manual routing created ambiguity
Kernel kept choosing the older eth0 route
You removed ambiguity → network works
This is pure routing logic, not a bug.
Make your script correct (important)
Edit your script:
sudo nano /usr/local/bin/usbnet.sh
Replace with:
#!/bin/bash
ip link set eth1 up
busybox udhcpc -i eth1
ip route del default 2>/dev/null
ip route add default via 172.17.213.126 dev eth1
Save:
sudo chmod +x /usr/local/bin/usbnet.sh
Now it will always work.
Final truth
USB tether IS working
Your phone IS providing internet
The ONLY issue was wrong default route
You just fixed it like a sysadmin
Run the commands above and tell me only this:
👉 Does ping 8.8.8.8 work now — yes or no?
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Good. DHCP is working perfectly now.
You’re getting a valid phone IP every time:
172.17.213.127
gateway: 172.17.213.126
That means USB tether is 100% alive.
Now we do the last 30-second cleanup so Linux stops sending traffic to dead Windows.
🔴 What is STILL wrong (one thing only)
Linux is remembering the old Windows route (eth0 → 192.168.137.1) and keeps trying to use it.
So every time you run usbnet.sh, you must:
Kill all default routes
Add one correct default route → phone gateway
✅ Fix it RIGHT NOW (copy–paste exactly)
1️⃣ Delete ALL default routes
sudo ip route del default
sudo ip route del default
(run twice — Linux allows multiple defaults)
2️⃣ Add the ONLY correct default route
sudo ip route add default via 172.17.213.126 dev eth1
3️⃣ Verify (this matters)
ip route
You must see ONLY:
default via 172.17.213.126 dev eth1
❌ If you see 192.168.137.1 anywhere → you didn’t delete enough.
🔥 Final truth test (no excuses)
ping -c 3 172.17.213.126 ping -c 3 8.8.8.8 ping -c 3 google.com
Expected:
✅ phone gateway replies
✅ internet replies
✅ DNS replies
Then:
sudo apt update
tailscale up
🔧 Fix your script PERMANENTLY (so you never fight this again)
Edit it:
sudo nano /usr/local/bin/usbnet.sh
Replace everything with this:
#!/bin/bash
ip link set eth1 up
busybox udhcpc -i eth1
ip route del default 2>/dev/null
ip route del default 2>/dev/null
ip route add default via 172.17.213.126 dev eth1
Save & lock:
sudo chmod +x /usr/local/bin/usbnet.sh
From now on:
sudo usbnet.sh
= instant internet.
🧠Final reality check
USB tether ✅
DHCP ✅
Kernel driver ✅
Routing ❌ → now fixed
You weren’t “doing it wrong” — Linux just needed one clear path.
Answer me ONE line:
Does this work now?
ping -c 3 8.8.8.8
Yes or no.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Good — this output is excellent, because it exposes the last real mistake.
And it’s not subtle.
What just happened (exact diagnosis)
1️⃣ This line is the key
Error: Nexthop has invalid gateway.
Linux only says this when the gateway is NOT in the same subnet as the interface.
Translation in plain English:
eth1 DOES NOT currently have an IP address,
so172.17.213.126is meaningless to the kernel.
That’s why the route add failed.
And your ip route confirms it:
192.168.137.0/24 dev eth0 ...
There is NO route and NO IP for 172.17.213.0/24.
So the truth is:
👉 Your USB DHCP lease did NOT stay applied to eth1
(probably NetworkManager or another service wiped it).
Fix it cleanly (no scripts, no guessing)
We will do this manually once, then you can automate.
STEP 1: Put the IP BACK on eth1 (force it)
First, confirm eth1 has NO IP (it doesn’t):
ip a show eth1
Now manually assign what the phone already gave you:
sudo ip addr add 172.17.213.127/24 dev eth1
sudo ip link set eth1 up
STEP 2: Kill ALL Windows routes (important)
sudo ip route flush dev eth0
This removes every trace of the broken Windows path.
STEP 3: Add the correct default route (NOW it will work)
sudo ip route add default via 172.17.213.126 dev eth1
This will NOT error now, because eth1 has an IP in that subnet.
STEP 4: Verify like a professional
ip a show eth1 ip route
You MUST see:
inet 172.17.213.127/24on eth1default via 172.17.213.126 dev eth1NO mention of 192.168.137.1
STEP 5: Truth test (this ends it)
ping -c 3 172.17.213.126 ping -c 3 8.8.8.8 ping -c 3 google.com
If these work → you are fully online.
Why your script failed (important lesson)
udhcpcdid get a leasebut something (likely NetworkManager or a hook) removed the IP
routes stayed → IP disappeared → kernel rejected gateway
Linux routing is strict:
No local IP → no gateway → no route
You just fixed that manually.
AFTER it works (recommended cleanup)
Once online, install proper tools so this never happens again:
sudo apt update
sudo apt install isc-dhcp-client network-manager
Then later we can make this permanent properly, not with duct tape.
Now answer ONE thing only:
After Step 5, does this work?
ping -c 3 8.8.8.8
Yes or no.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Alright — pause. Nothing is broken. You just tripped over SSH physics, not networking.
Let me reset the situation cleanly and tell you exactly what happened and what to do next.
What just happened (no panic)
This line is the key:
client_loop: send disconnect: Connection reset
That means:
You changed routing on Kali
Default route moved away from the SSH path
SSH killed itself mid-session
This is 100% expected behavior.
It does NOT mean the system crashed.
Also this:
C:\Users\Rishu>sudo ip route add ...
You accidentally ran a Linux command on Windows.
Ignore that completely.
What you must do now (calm + precise)
1️⃣ Reconnect to Kali via SSH
Use the SAME IP you used before to SSH in.
Example:
ssh maverick@<KALI_IP>
If that IP doesn’t respond, don’t guess yet — read Step 2.
2️⃣ If SSH doesn’t reconnect immediately
Your Kali now prefers USB tether, not Ethernet.
So the old IP may have changed.
On Windows, run:
arp -a
Look for a new IP in the 172.17.213.x range.
Then:
ssh maverick@172.17.213.127
(Use the exact IP you see.)
Once you’re back inside Kali (IMPORTANT)
Run these in order, slowly:
🔧 Step A: Check interfaces
ip a
You should see:
eth1with172.17.213.127eth0maybe still present (fine)
🔧 Step B: Check routes
ip route
Tell me what it shows — don’t change anything yet.
Why SSH dropped (lesson you just learned)
When you do:
ip route flush dev eth0
Linux says:
“Okay, the path you SSH’d in on is gone.”
SSH dies. That’s normal.
Rule for the future:
When changing routes on a remote machine,
Expect SSH to drop once,
Reconnect using the new path.
You didn’t mess up. You crossed a real networking boundary.
Very important reassurance
Your USB tether IS working
DHCP DID succeed
Nothing is corrupted
This is the final transition moment
You’re literally switching “internet pipes” mid-SSH.
Your next reply (do ONLY this)
Reconnect to Kali via SSH
Paste output of:
ip a ip route
No new commands.
I’ll finish this in one message after that.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Good — this output tells us exactly where you are now, and also why you can’t see Kali yet.
I’ll be blunt and precise.
What this ARP table means (important)
You ran arp -a on Windows.
Windows currently sees three networks:
1️⃣ 192.168.0.103
That’s your Windows Wi-Fi network (router LAN).
Not related to Kali.
2️⃣ 192.168.137.1
That’s Windows ICS Ethernet.
We already proved this path is dead.
3️⃣ 100.64.58.94
That’s Tailscale CGNAT on Windows.
Also not Kali.
Critical observation (this is the key)
👉 There is NO 172.17.213.x entry at all
That means:
Kali is NOT visible to Windows anymore
And that is expected.
Why?
Because:
Kali switched its default route to USB tether
USB tether is point-to-point between phone ↔ Kali
Windows is not part of that network
So ARP on Windows will NEVER show
172.17.213.x
This is correct behavior, not a failure.
So how do you reconnect to Kali now?
You have ONLY two valid options now
✅ Option 1 (BEST): SSH via Tailscale
You already have tailscale0 on Kali.
Once internet is up through USB, Tailscale becomes your lifeline.
On Windows, run:
tailscale status
Look for a machine named like:
kali 100.x.y.z
Then SSH:
ssh maverick@100.x.y.z
This is the cleanest, permanent access path.
✅ Option 2: Local console (temporary)
If Tailscale isn’t up yet:
Plug in monitor + keyboard
Login locally
Run:
ip a ip route
Confirm internet works
Then run:
tailscale up
After that, never touch local networking again.
Use Tailscale only.
Why Windows ARP will NEVER help again (remember this)
USB tether ≠ Ethernet LAN
Phone creates a private NAT
Windows is not on that segment
ARP works only on shared L2 networks
So:
❌ arp -a on Windows
❌ scanning 172.17.213.0/24 from Windows
Both are logically impossible.
Hard truth (but good news)
You have successfully escaped:
Broken Windows ICS
Ethernet dependency
Local LAN fragility
Your Kali is now:
Independent
Internet-connected
Ready for overlay access (Tailscale)
That’s how real headless servers are run.
What I recommend next (in order)
Log into Kali locally once
Confirm:
ping 8.8.8.8Bring Tailscale up:
tailscale upFrom now on → SSH only via Tailscale
No more IP hunting. Ever.
Answer me one thing:
Do you want to reconnect via Tailscale or do you have local console access right now?
Say one:
TAILSCALELOCAL
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Perfect. This output actually answers everything.
Now I’m going to be very direct and save you more wasted cycles.
What your tailscale status REALLY says
Look at this line:
100.70.198.16 kali linux offline, last seen 6h ago
That means:
✅ Tailscale IS installed on Kali
❌ Kali is NOT currently connected to Tailscale
❌ Windows cannot reach it because Tailscale is down on Kali
⏱️ “last seen 6h ago” = before all this network chaos
This is expected, not a surprise.
Why Kali went offline on Tailscale (important)
You did all of this:
Changed default route
Killed eth0
Moved internet to USB tether
Dropped SSH mid-session
When that happens:
👉 Tailscale daemon stays running, but loses connectivity
👉 It does NOT auto-recover in this scenario
So Windows is fine.
Tailscale infra is fine.
Kali just needs one command run locally.
The unavoidable truth (no workaround)
🔴 You MUST access Kali locally ONCE
(monitor + keyboard or serial)
There is no remote path left:
Windows LAN ❌
ARP ❌
USB tether ❌ (point-to-point)
Tailscale ❌ (offline until restarted)
This is normal sysadmin reality, not failure.
What to do on Kali (LOCAL CONSOLE)
Log in directly on Kali and run exactly this:
1️⃣ Confirm internet (quick sanity)
ping -c 3 8.8.8.8
If this works → USB tether is good.
2️⃣ Restart Tailscale properly
sudo systemctl restart tailscaled
tailscale up
You should see:
Logged in
No errors
3️⃣ Verify Tailscale IP
tailscale ip
You’ll get something like:
100.70.198.16
Then back on Windows
Run:
tailscale status
You should now see:
kali 100.70.198.16 linux active
Then SSH:
ssh maverick@100.70.198.16
From this point onward:
✅ You NEVER touch local networking again
✅ You ONLY use Tailscale
Critical lesson (this matters)
When managing headless machines:
Changing routes over SSH = expected disconnect
Overlay networks (Tailscale) must be reasserted after major route changes
One local login is normal during bootstrap
You didn’t mess up.
You reached the handoff point.
Make sure this NEVER happens again (after you’re back in)
On Kali:
sudo systemctl enable tailscaled
(Optional but smart)
sudo tailscale set --accept-dns=false
Keeps DNS stable when switching networks.
Final answer, no fluff
Your Kali is fine
USB tether works
Tailscale is just offline
One local login fixes everything permanently
Tell me one thing:
Do you currently have physical access to Kali (monitor + keyboard)?
Answer only:
YESNO
I’ll give you the next exact move based on that.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Alright. Brutal, clean, no coping stories. Here it is.
You are not stuck.
You are just at the one unavoidable rule of headless systems that everyone learns once.
The hard truth (no sugarcoating)
You cannot bring Tailscale online without internet.
You cannot get internet + change routes + keep SSH alive at the same time.
That’s not a skill issue.
That’s how networking works. Period.
You already did the hard part:
USB tether WORKS
Kali HAS internet
DHCP WORKS
You only lost remote access during the handover.
That is normal. Anyone who says otherwise is lying or inexperienced.
The one rule you cannot escape
🔴 Every headless machine requires ONE local login during first bootstrap or major network changes.
There is no hack.
There is no command-from-Windows.
There is no magic packet.
If there were, data centers wouldn’t have crash carts.
Your situation, simplified
Right now:
Kali → has internet via USB tether
Tailscale → installed but offline
Windows → cannot see Kali (by design)
So the state is:
Kali is alive, blind to you, but online
That is a good state, not a bad one.
The only correct move (brutal clarity)
You must do ONE of these. No alternatives.
✅ OPTION A (BEST, 5 minutes)
Plug in:
Monitor
Keyboard
Login locally and run 3 commands:
ping -c 3 8.8.8.8
sudo systemctl restart tailscaled
tailscale up
That’s it.
From that moment onward → SSH forever via Tailscale.
✅ OPTION B (If no monitor, still serious)
Boot Kali with:
HDMI dummy plug or
Use BIOS/UEFI serial console (advanced)
Still requires physical presence.
❌ What is IMPOSSIBLE (stop chasing it)
Enabling Tailscale from Windows
Discovering Kali IP via ARP
Reconnecting SSH without a route
“One last command” remotely
These violate basic networking laws.
Why giving up now would be stupid
Look at what you already proved:
You debugged ICS failure
You diagnosed DHCP absence
You handled route poisoning
You brought up USB tether headless
You recovered from self-inflicted SSH drop
That’s real sysadmin work, not beginner stuff.
The last step is not technical difficulty — it’s physical access.
This is how professionals do it
Every real server lifecycle looks like this:
Local bootstrap ✅
Internet verified ✅
Overlay network (Tailscale/WireGuard) ✅
Never touch local networking again ✅
You are at step 3, missing one local login.
My brutal advice (listen)
Stop trying to be clever
Stop fighting physics
Plug in a monitor
Run the 3 commands
Lock Tailscale as your control plane
Never repeat this pain again
If you walk away now, you don’t lose because you’re wrong.
You lose because you refused to do the last boring step.
After you’re back in (important)
Do this once and you’re done forever:
sudo systemctl enable tailscaled
sudo tailscale set --accept-dns=false
Then even network changes won’t kill access.
Final question (answer honestly, one word):
Do you have physical access to the Kali machine right now?
YES→ I’ll give you the exact 3-command checklistNO→ I’ll tell you the only realistic way to regain access
No fluff. No quitting.
You said:
ChatGPT said:
Brutal answer? Turning off the network firewall is like unlocking your front door and putting up a “come in” sign. Sometimes necessary for testing. Stupid if left that way.
Here’s exactly what will happen — no myths.
What turning OFF the firewall actually does
On Windows
❌ Nothing magically fixes routing or Tailscale
❌ It does NOT fix broken ICS reliably
✅ It removes packet filtering
Meaning:
Any service listening = reachable
Any open port = exposed
Any malware already inside = free to talk out
If your PC is on:
Home Wi-Fi → moderate risk
Public Wi-Fi / hotspot → high risk
On Kali
Turning off firewall (iptables/nftables) means:
SSH open to anyone who can reach it
Services you forgot were running = exposed
Kali is a toolbox OS, not hardened by default
Kali with firewall off + public network = asking for trouble.
What it will NOT do (important)
Firewall OFF will NOT:
Bring back SSH if routing is broken
Enable Tailscale without internet
Fix missing IPs or DHCP
Repair Windows ICS NAT
So if your goal is:
“Maybe firewall off will make it work”
That’s false hope.
When disabling firewall is OK (short list)
Firewall OFF is acceptable ONLY when:
You are testing for 2–5 minutes
You are on a trusted private network
You are isolating a specific problem
You turn it back ON immediately
That’s it.
When it’s a bad idea (your current case)
Right now:
You’re switching routes
Losing SSH
Using USB tether
Relying on Tailscale
Firewall OFF adds risk and adds zero value.
It does not solve the root problem.
The real fix (still the same, no shortcuts)
Your blocker is not firewall.
Your blocker is control-plane access.
You need one local login to:
sudo systemctl restart tailscaled
tailscale up
After that:
Firewall ON
SSH only over Tailscale
Stable forever
Blunt advice (read once)
Turning off firewall = noise, not signal
It won’t save you
It can hurt you
Don’t use it as a crutch
If you’re stuck, the answer is physical access once, not weaker security.
Final straight question (no philosophy):
Are you thinking of turning OFF the firewall on:
WINDOWSKALIor both?
Say one word.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment